Once Inspired

Archive for January, 2010

This is certainly the best article I have read regarding training. I have been training like this for a while now and, not to brag, but it shows. Please enjoy an exemplary and very informative piece of writing.

“There are many myths about lactic acid.  Perhaps the greatest of all is the notion that there is lactic acid in the human body.  There is not.  The body actually produces lactate, which is lactic acid minus one proton.

The difference between lactic acid and lactate is, for all practical purposes, semantic.  But other popular beliefs about lactic acid (or, as I will properly call it from this point forward, lactate) are about as wrong as wrong can be.  Most triathletes believe that lactate is an end product of anaerobic muscle metabolism that causes local muscle fatigue by increasing the acidity of the tissues to the point where they no longer can function effectively.  In fact, we now know that lactate is an intermediate link between anaerobic and aerobic muscle metabolism that serves as both a direct and indirect fuel for muscle contraction and delays fatigue in a couple of different ways.

Our new understanding of the nature and function of lactate is interesting to all athletes who are curious about how the human body works.  But does it make any practical difference?  Does the new science of lactate suggest a different approach to training than the old science did?  I would suggest that it does call for a subtle tweaking of the standard approach to endurance training, but no major overhaul.  Before we get to that, however, let’s take a closer look at how the classic beliefs about lactate were exposed as myths and replaced by an almost opposite explanation.

The classic explanation of lactate in exercise dates back to the 1920s, when researchers showed that the exposure of frog legs to high levels of lactic acid (not lactate) interfered with the ability of the muscles to contract in response to electrical stimulation.  Later research determined that lactate was produced through anaerobic glycolysis, or the breakdown of glucose or glycogen molecules for energy without the help of oxygen.  It was then concluded that fatigue occurred at high exercise intensities because the cardiovascular system could no longer supply the muscles with enough oxygen to keep pace with muscular energy demands, resulting in increasing reliance on anaerobic glycolysis, hence lactate buildup.

How exactly did lactate buildup cause the muscles to fatigue?  Biochemists believed that lactate was formed in the body by the removal of a proton from lactic acid.  When protons accumulate in living tissues, these tissues become more acidic.  And when muscles become too acidic, they lose their ability to contract.

This tidy little explanation began to unravel in 1977, when South African biochemist Wieland Gevers showed that the reaction producing lactate actually consumes a pair of free protons, thus retarding muscular acidosis rather than promoting it.  Much more recently, scientists have observed that while protons do indeed accumulate in the muscles during high-intensity exercise, increasing muscle acidity, these protons are produced through a reaction that is completely separate from that which produces lactate.

To make matters even worse for supporters of the classic lactate hypothesis, we now know not only that lactate does not cause muscular acidosis, but also that the muscles never reach a level of acidity that would directly cause dysfunction (or fatigue) of the muscle fibers anyway.  The body’s normal pH at rest is approximately 7.4.  During intense exercise, as the muscles become more acidic, pH may drop as low as 7.0 at the point of exhaustion.  However, when muscle cells are electrically stimulated outside the body, mechanical failure only occurs when the pH drops all the way down to 6.8.  This observation suggests that fatigue always occurs before a catastrophic loss of acid-base homeostasis in the muscles takes place.

What’s more, research conducted within the past decade has shown that lactate counteracts another cause of muscle fatigue at high exercise intensities: namely, depolarization.  Muscle contractions are stimulated by electrical currents that flow throughout the body via minerals including sodium and potassium.  Each muscle cell contraction involves a lightning-fast exchange in which potassium molecules inside the muscle cell and sodium molecules outside the muscle cell switch places.  These exchanges are most efficient when there is a high degree of polarization (a difference in the strength of the electrical charge) between the spaces inside and outside the cells. At the beginning of high-intensity exercise, the inside of the muscle cell has a much stronger positive charge than the area outside the muscle cell.  This difference in charge strength makes it easy for sodium and potassium to cross the cell membrane.  During sustained high-intensity activity, potassium is released from the muscle cells faster than it can be channeled back in through special potassium pumps in the cell membrane.  The resulting buildup of potassium outside the muscle cells causes a progressive lessening of the difference in charge strength between the intracellular and intercellular spaces, hence weaker and less efficient muscle contractions (i.e. fatigue).

It is now widely recognized by researchers in this area that muscle cell depolarization is a much more significant cause of muscle fatigue than muscular acidosis.  Where does lactate fit in?  In a series of studies beginning in 2001, Ole Nielsen of the University of Aarhus, Denmark, has shown that high levels of lactate partially restore muscle cell function in a depolarized state.  Hence, if your muscles did not produce large amounts of lactate during high-intensity exercise, your muscles would actually fatigue a lot sooner.

The story does not end there.  In the new scientific understanding of lactate, arguably the most important role of lactate during exercise is not to delay fatigue caused by muscular acidosis or muscle cell depolarization but is rather to serve as a direct and indirect fuel for muscle contractions.  That’s right: the substance that was once thought to be a worse-than-useless byproduct of anaerobic glycolysis turns out to be one of the most important energy sources for high-intensity muscle activity.

Our knowledge of lactate as a muscle fuel is largely the product of the work of one man: George Brooks of the University of California-Berkeley.  Brooks became interested in lactate in the 1960s, when his track coach at Queens College told him that lactic acid was the cause of the burning sensation and loss of performance he experienced when running hard.  Brooks went on to earn a doctoral degree in exercise physiology and made the study of lactate his life’s work.

Brooks began to suspect that the classical lactate theory was dead wrong when, in one early experiment, he gave radioactive lactic acid to rats (so he could trace it) and found that their bodies used it faster than any other energy source.  So he then set about figuring out how lactate was used.  The result of this process was the discovery of the lactate shuttle (now known as the extracellular lactate shuttle).  Lactate is a highly mobile compound that easily leaks through the walls of the muscle cells that produce it into the bloodstream.  From there the lactate flows to other muscles (especially resting muscles and muscles working at lower intensities) and other organs—especially the heart, liver, and brain—and used as a fuel.  Lactate that reaches the liver is even converted back into glucose and sent back to the hardest-working muscles to replenish declining fuel stores.

When Brooks published his first research on the lactate shuttle in the mid-1980s, he did not propose that any organ used lactate as a direct energy source.  While his proposal that widespread use of lactate as an indirect energy source during exercise was radically new, Brooks did not initially challenge the notion that the human body is incapable of directly oxidizing lactate to release energy.  Instead he hewed to the universally held conviction that lactate had to be converted to pyruvate before oxygen could do anything useful with it.  But secretly Brooks suspected that some types of cells, including muscle cells, can break down lactate aerobically, and within the past few years he has definitively proven that this is indeed the case.

First Brooks showed that endurance training reduces the amount of lactate that enters the bloodstream without affecting the amount of lactate that the muscle cells produce—a strong piece of circumstantial evidence that lactate is somehow used within the cell.  In fact, as much as 75 percent of the lactate produced by any given muscle cell never leaves it.  Then, in 2006, Brooks was able to peer through a confocal microscope and all but see aerobic lactate metabolism in the mitochondria, the intracellular site of aerobic metabolism.  Gathered together there he saw the transporter proteins that deliver lactate to the mitochondria, the enzymes that catalyze the first step of lactate breakdown, and the protein complex where oxygen is used to complete the process of energy release.  A smoking gun if there ever was one!

It would be difficult to overstate the magnitude of this discovery.  George Brooks showed that there is a direct link between aerobic and anaerobic metabolism.  In fact, what was previously thought to be anaerobic metabolism is actually just incomplete aerobic metabolism.  During moderate-intensity exercise, most of the carbohydrate that is broken down for energy is processed aerobically and produces no lactate.  But at high intensities, a second pathway—the lactate pathway—ramps up, giving the muscle two parallel pathways to release energy aerobically at very high rates to keep up with the muscle’s energy demands.  In this second pathway, glycogen or glucose is broken down to lactate without oxygen, and then lactate is broken down to carbon dioxide and water with oxygen.

Brooks is not done yet.  His most recent research has looked at the role of lactate in cell signaling.  It suggests that the high levels of intracellular lactate that arise during intense exercise stimulate some of the beneficial fitness adaptations that occur in response to such training.  Specifically, high lactate concentrations trigger the production of free radicals that “upregulate” a variety of genes.  Some of these genes govern mitochondrial biogenesis.  So it appears that intracellular lactate accumulation during intense exercise stimulates the muscle cell to produce more mitochondria, thus enhancing its ability to burn lactate (and other fuels) in future workouts.

If I had to package all of the forgoing science into a single upshot, it would be this: According to the classical theory of lactate, one of the highest priorities of training was to reduce the amount of lactate the body produces at higher exercise intensities so that the athlete can race faster without fatiguing due to high lactate levels.  According to the new theory of lactate, one of the highest priorities of training is to increase the body’s capacity to use lactate during high-intensity exercise so that the athlete can race faster.

So what practical difference does this shift make in terms of how we train?  In truth, not much, because the advanced training methods that today’s best-informed triathletes use were developed through blind trial and error, and were not fashioned consciously to conform to now-discredited ideas about lactate.

That said, for many years lactate-conscious coaches have counseled athletes to strictly limit the amount of training they do above the lactate threshold because the large amounts of lactate produced in such workouts are very stressful to the body.  The rationale for this widely heeded caution has disappeared.  It certainly remains true that the physiological stressfulness of exercise increases exponentially as its intensity does, such that the amount of training the body can handle is inversely related to its intensity.  But lactate is not the reason.  And lactate threshold intensity is not all that high.  In the typical trained triathlete it corresponds to the fastest swimming, cycling, or running speed that can be sustained for one hour.  There’s plenty of room to go faster in your training without wearing yourself down.

Furthermore, as we have seen, far from stressing the body, high lactate levels trigger some of the most important performance-boosting muscle adaptations.  You might not be able to handle a high volume of training above the lactate threshold (again, for reasons that have nothing to do with lactate), but the new science of lactate suggests that you should go there frequently nonetheless.  Many triathletes wait until the race phase of training to introduce supra-threshold training into their bike and run regimens (swimming, as always, is another matter.  Training in this discipline is entirely based on high-intensity interval work).  It would be better to do a small amount of supra-threshold training throughout the training cycle, with the greatest volume of such training immediately preceding races, for those who compete in short-course events (because lactate threshold pace is close to race pace at theses distances) and falling somewhat earlier for those who compete in long-course races.

How much supra-threshold training is enough?  A Spanish study involving cross-country runners found that a mix of 81-percent moderate-intensity training, 10.5-percent lactate threshold training, and 8.5 percent supra-threshold training produced optimal results.  That 8.5 percentage is a sensible median target.  All triathletes should do 5 percent of their bike and run training at supra-threshold intensities as a baseline.  Short-course specialists can peak at roughly 12 percent and long-course triathletes at 8-10 percent.

Research has shown that the greatest lactate exposures occur in workouts consisting of 3- to 5-minute intervals at VO₂max velocity separated by 2- to 3-minute active recoveries and in 30- or 60-second intervals at the same intensity separated by active recoveries of equal duration.  VO₂max velocity is approximately the fastest speed you can sustain for 10 minutes in swimming, cycling or running. Lactate interval workouts featuring shorter intervals are a bit more manageable and should therefore come earlier in the training process.   Never try to do more than 20 total minutes of VO₂max-intensity swimming, cycling or running into a single session.  If you do, you will boil alive in toxic lactic acid.

Just kidding.”

Written by: Matt Fitzgerald

Taken from http://triathlete-europe.competitor.com/

Technique in swimming is the single most important thing to making a success of it. Unfortunately swimming is more complex than most would perceive it to be. Bad habits are hard to break and because each movement affects the next your technique is important from start to finish.

Head position is vital as your head leads the way. A lot of swimmers have a good head position whilst facing down but as soon as it comes to taking a breath head tilt becomes a factor and the swimmer is making corrections from this point forward thus rendering the rest of the stroke inefficient and the swimmer begins to tire. Maintaining a good head position ensures alignment thereby making the swimmer more streamlined.

Another common mistake lies with hand entry. Many swimmers tend to enter the water just infront of their head. This is often the cause for a dropping shoulder which leads to a number of inefficiencies, such as excessive roll and excessive hip flexation, and is also one of the primary causes of shoulder injury. Hand entry should happen between 20 and 30cm in front of the head.

It is important that the hips rotate in the same plain as the shoulders through the stroke thereby maintaining a good line along the central axis. Arm cross-over is another common problem and is best explained as follows: Breathing to the left can cause the right arm to cut across the central axis and vice versa.  This simply threatens the linearity of the central axis resulting in inefficiency.

It is important that your stroke through the water be as effective as possible. Swimmers need to ensure that their hands and forearms are catching as much water as possible. This is achieved by keeping the hand and forearm perpendicular with the bottom of the pool for as long as possible. Remembering to roll through the stroke as the arm rotates from the shoulder will maintain a straight central axis through the stroke.

At the end of the stroke, when the hand is at the hips, it is best to lift your arm out of the water by bending at the elbow from the shoulder. Never lift the hand higher than the elbow. This part of the stroke is known as recovery, the period during which the arm is out the water. Bringing your hand forward in a straight line close to the side of your body increases efficiency. Many swimmers flick their hands out of the water and swing their hands out sideways during recovery. This is not only inefficient but is the most common cause of tired shoulders. It also places strain on the bicep tendons and rotator cuffs.

Injuries resulting from a poor swimming technique are rotator cuff syndrome and other forms of tendonitis. Hip and lower back pain is something that is fairly common too but few blame swimming for those aches and pains.

If you would like to know more or add to this please leave a comment or email me at nic@onceinspired.co.za

Good luck. Happy swimming

The Darwin Awards

Yes, it’s that magical time of year again when the Darwin Awards are bestowed, honouring the least evolved among us.

Here is the glorious winner:

1. When his 38 calibre revolver failed to fire at his intended victim during a hold-up in Long Beach , California would-be robber James Elliot did something that can only inspire wonder. He peered down the barrel and tried the trigger again. This time it worked.

And now, the honourable mentions:

2. The chef at a hotel in Switzerland lost a finger in a meat cutting machine and after a little shopping around, submitted a claim to his insurance company. The company expecting negligence sent out one of its men to have a look for himself. He tried the machine and he also lost a finger. The chef’s claim was approved.

3. A man who shovelled snow for an hour to clear a space for his car during a blizzard in Chicago returned with his vehicle to find a woman had taken the space. Understandably, he shot her.

4. After stopping for drinks at an illegal bar, a Zimbabwean bus driver found that the 20 mental patients he was supposed to be transporting from Harare to Bulawayo had escaped. Not wanting to admit his incompetence, the driver went to a nearby bus stop and offered everyone waiting there a free ride. He then delivered the passengers to the mental hospital, telling the staff that the patients were very excitable and prone to bizarre fantasies. The deception wasn’t discovered for 3 days.

5. An American teenager was in the hospital recovering from serious head wounds received from an oncoming train. When asked how he received the injuries, the lad told police that he was simply trying to see how close he could get his head to a moving train before he was hit.

6. A man walked into a Louisiana Circle-K, put a $20 bill on the counter, and asked for change. When the clerk opened the cash drawer, the man pulled a gun and asked for all the cash in the register, which the clerk promptly provided. The man took the cash from the clerk and fled, leaving the $20 bill on the counter. The total amount of cash he got from the drawer…. $15. [If someone points a gun at you and gives you money, is a crime committed?]

7. Seems an Arkansas guy wanted some beer pretty badly. He decided that he’d just throw a cinder block through a liquor store window, grab some booze, and run. So he lifted the cinder block and heaved it over his head at the window. The cinder block bounced back and hit the would-be thief on the head, knocking him unconscious. The liquor store window was made of Plexiglas. The whole event was caught on videotape.

8. As a female shopper exited a New York convenience store, a man grabbed her purse and ran. The clerk called 911 immediately, and the woman was able to give them a detailed description of the snatcher. Within minutes, the police apprehended the snatcher. They put him in the car and drove back to the store. The thief was then taken out of the car and told to stand there for a positive ID. To which he replied, “Yes, officer, that’s her. That’s the lady I stole the purse from.”

9. The Ann Arbor News crime column reported that a man walked into a Burger King in Ypsilanti, Michigan at 5 A.M., flashed a gun, and demanded cash. The clerk turned him down because he said he couldn’t open the cash register without a food order. When the man ordered onion rings, the clerk said they weren’t available for breakfast. The man, frustrated, walked away. [*A 5-STAR STUPIDITY AWARD WINNER]

10. When a man attempted to siphon gasoline from a motor home parked on a Seattle street, he got much more than he bargained for. Police arrived at the scene to find a very sick man curled up next to a motor home near spilled sewage. A police spokesman said that the man admitted to trying to steal gasoline, but he plugged his siphon hose into the motor home’s sewage tank by mistake. The owner of the vehicle declined to press charges saying that it was the best laugh he’d ever had.

Technique is vital, training efficiently and maintaining a good technique while racing  is important and will save youtime. It’s also useful for keeping injuries away.

It’s the age-old question that bugs every triathlete: how should you focus your training? As we head into the new season, most of us will be planning (or will have planned) the months to come. A lot of us will cram in as many miles as possible, while others will go for a more structured approach to their training.

But whichever path you choose to take, it’s worth heeding the advice of Pete Jacobs. Eighth at Kona and one of the fastest swimmers in Ironman (he was third out of the water at Hawaii in 50:03), the Aussie has honed his training to ensure he gets the optimum return from the miles that he puts in.

“It’s about technique,” Pete said, in a recent interview with Triathlete Europe. “It doesn’t matter how many kilometres in the pool you do, you’re still not going to swim quicker than someone who has a better technique.

“It’s not about strength. Look at the chicks in the ITU; they’re tiny. But they out swim the guys through having better technique: they’re more streamlined.

“I keep telling some of the guys I hang around with to work on technique in the pool.

“They have done thirty, forty, fifty kilometres in the pool in a week and I jump in the pool and I can still swim beside them and they hate me! I say to them ‘aren’t you thinking about every single stroke?’ and they say ‘well, not really, no.’ But I am, and that’s the difference.”

And Pete’s focus on technique goes beyond the pool.

“It’s the same with running. Running and swimming are definitely things where I’ve read and become a lot more interested in technique. I’ve really noticed the difference – it’s become easier.

“With less training I’m going quicker just because I’m thinking more about technique.

“It’s a more efficient way to train. I enjoy it more. I go out and run two-and-a-half hours and be thinking about my stride nearly every stride. I enjoy that. I enjoy working towards that change and working towards a better stride, a better stroke and being comfortable on the strike.”

Taken from http://triathlete-europe.competitor.com/